MAGA, MAGEE, MAG-A ?! This conversation in two voices (that does not really reflect female and male except in tone and pitch) diverges from talking about the book and its concepts to general "discussion" at a grade school level of how politics work and generalities about the people and elections. It is these things that AI uses to draw on to be able to actually have a general conversation.
I guess it is supposed to come off as magnanimous and inclusive here. That is where the woke "magic" is comes in.
The AI can list key points in the book but its dive into the chapter is actually shallow. If I were a student in school I would not get much from this. It leaves out doing our own thinking about the subject and working out what we like and dislike, find valid or erroneous, or want to contemplate and digest. I always found that the more I interact with information the more I own it. AI makes one glance over a topic like skipping flat pebbles across a pond. Or listening to a tune on the radio while driving. I don't know how much is retained in long term memory. You remember you heard something but not much about what it was about.
Interesting but hard to listen to their voices, mostly the female🤮and the way they both pronounced MAGA with a soft g rather than a hard g (as in great). I read Navarro’s points and it’s much more direct and understandable.
I was out walking today in the very nice San Diego neighborhood of Kensington when I saw that someone had a "Trump for Prison" sign out on their lawn. It's a mystery to me how anyone could have a digestive tract so long as to be able to get their head that far up their ass.
MAGA, MAGEE, MAG-A ?! This conversation in two voices (that does not really reflect female and male except in tone and pitch) diverges from talking about the book and its concepts to general "discussion" at a grade school level of how politics work and generalities about the people and elections. It is these things that AI uses to draw on to be able to actually have a general conversation.
I guess it is supposed to come off as magnanimous and inclusive here. That is where the woke "magic" is comes in.
The AI can list key points in the book but its dive into the chapter is actually shallow. If I were a student in school I would not get much from this. It leaves out doing our own thinking about the subject and working out what we like and dislike, find valid or erroneous, or want to contemplate and digest. I always found that the more I interact with information the more I own it. AI makes one glance over a topic like skipping flat pebbles across a pond. Or listening to a tune on the radio while driving. I don't know how much is retained in long term memory. You remember you heard something but not much about what it was about.
Interesting but hard to listen to their voices, mostly the female🤮and the way they both pronounced MAGA with a soft g rather than a hard g (as in great). I read Navarro’s points and it’s much more direct and understandable.
I was out walking today in the very nice San Diego neighborhood of Kensington when I saw that someone had a "Trump for Prison" sign out on their lawn. It's a mystery to me how anyone could have a digestive tract so long as to be able to get their head that far up their ass.