20 Comments

Biden turns a blind eye for the threat of China exposing Biden for the Traitor he is!

Expand full comment

"As to why the Biden regime continues to allow the Chinese military and state researched institutes of artificial intelligence to continue to buy the coveted A100 and H 100 Nvidia chips is a mystery". That's a pretty funny question. Everyone knows that the CCP got to the Biden crime family early with millions in bribes. Biden is the greatest traitor in US history.

Expand full comment

AI is here to stay, but the problem with it is that it is not honest or independent of the companies that build, program and train it. Owned, and WOKE programed AIs will not give accurate output. The AIs plagiarize, Lie, hallucinate, or simple say they cannot answer that question because it violates (insert company name here) terms of service, or, You are asking it to provide disinformation. How good will such AIs be for financial analysis, or determining medical treatment for a patient under such core programing. The theft of technology is another whole can of worms.

Besides following Joe Allen and his substack: (https://joebot.substack.com), and his book Dark Aeon, i watch Anastasia In Tech on Youtube: (https://www.youtube.com/@AnastasiInTech) Her substack: ( https://anastasiintech.substack.com/ ) on the development of Chips and chip manufacturing equipment development. No matter where you stand on AI, these are good sources of information.

Expand full comment

The craziness continues. Why am I thinking that communities will be created that will be similar to Amish communities of today where no AI is allowed and everyone will know how to use hand tools.

Expand full comment

Hopefully, Nvidia is putting a back door into chips they’re supplying to China…

Expand full comment

Perhaps the USG already has.

Expand full comment

All the Chips are made in China / Taiwan.

What is your Problem?

https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/artificial-intelligence-abuse-prevention

Expand full comment

Is this the same nvidia company that made game processors for like 486’s?

Expand full comment

Your speech at CPAC was incredible! We absolutely support you. God bless you and your family.

Expand full comment

AI is a bane to society, so let China have all the chips they want and maybe AI will destroy the CCP.

Expand full comment

Yea, I had front row seats to the Nortel debacle. Painful.

Expand full comment

Like you, I remember more than one severe market downturn and lived through the bad 80's when the market hardly moved at all, and then the DOT COM bubble. It took the Dow from December 1999 to October of 2007 to recover, followed immediately by the financial disaster of 2008. The Dow finally recovered in 2013. Unless you were prescient in 2007, you stayed in the market and got hammered again. This market has a bad feel to it. I don't have another 15 years until retirement to ride out a bigish downturn. Might be time to get out of the market.

Expand full comment

Yup--the Fed kept the prime rate at zero percent for ten years hoping to bait the pensioners back into the market to further sucker punch them when they could least afford it. I see them now working at Costco checking receipts at the door.

Expand full comment

Yep. Exactly.

Expand full comment

I thought NVIDA said in it's earnings report that it is no longer selling the coveted AI chips to China due to US restrictions to China. Did I miss something?

Expand full comment

There is more to this story. The US Senate is currently diddling with AI regulation, and who should be the interested parties but Microsoft and Nvidia. Ready for my influence money closeup, Mr. DeMille. Music culture writer Ted Gioia on Substack recently wrote about discovering his own books had been AI pirated. This is not a victimless crime (as the saying goes).

Expand full comment

We keep selling the Commies the rope to hang us with.

Expand full comment

They have owned us for a long time now. Only Trump put a speed bump up for a few years.

Expand full comment

Furthermore, are businesses not taking on strategic risk by being dependent on the AI rule writers that exist outside their company, who shape the results returned by the AI, and who may not always share the same level of enthusiasm as a given company for the latter's business model? One need look no further than the recent deplatforming of Parler for an example of systemic business vulnerabilities introduced by 'new technology'.

Expand full comment

Is the error rate of AI really that much better than existing back offices and business processes, or do companies just not care anymore?

Expand full comment