We are treated (or maybe tortured) by the bulk of the presstitutes telling us that Kamala "won" the debate, as they base their conclusion upon some esoteric stuff about how many times their opponent stumbled or was distracted by their laughing and other junk like that. But the only thing that matters is: How many people were swayed to the other side? And on that count, anyone that reported that detail showed that Donald Trump had positive switching toward him, while Kamala lost voters.
Thank you Dr Navarro for laying the debate out so clearly in favor of President Trump on the most important issues.
Is anyone still talking about how Kamala had to have known the questions in advance? She was ready with her well rehearsed answers, almost seemed too ready to me. When she gave the answer to the question on Obamacare and brought up the whole John McCain deal, I thought....she doesn't think that quick on her feet, no way she just came up with that. That comment was so obviously intentionally inserted into her answer, she had to have known the question in advance. The Central.Park 5 was another...she knew how and when to get her low jabs in. Not a coincidence. We all know she is not that bright. But it turns out she has some good acting skills, for those who can't see through her facade. Thankfully, I think most people can see right through her. Nothing there.
We need to not pay attention to the monotonic diatribe spewing from the enemies of USA. Of course this platform is preaching to the choir. Where I live, Western PA, we are the choir being preached to. Scary enough, sports broadcasters are pro-kamala.
It was obvious to me Kamala was prepared for the questions and knew how she would respond. Ignoring the question about the economy and making a statement instead was rehearsed.
We are treated (or maybe tortured) by the bulk of the presstitutes telling us that Kamala "won" the debate, as they base their conclusion upon some esoteric stuff about how many times their opponent stumbled or was distracted by their laughing and other junk like that. But the only thing that matters is: How many people were swayed to the other side? And on that count, anyone that reported that detail showed that Donald Trump had positive switching toward him, while Kamala lost voters.
Thank you! Right on!
Thank you Dr Navarro for laying the debate out so clearly in favor of President Trump on the most important issues.
Is anyone still talking about how Kamala had to have known the questions in advance? She was ready with her well rehearsed answers, almost seemed too ready to me. When she gave the answer to the question on Obamacare and brought up the whole John McCain deal, I thought....she doesn't think that quick on her feet, no way she just came up with that. That comment was so obviously intentionally inserted into her answer, she had to have known the question in advance. The Central.Park 5 was another...she knew how and when to get her low jabs in. Not a coincidence. We all know she is not that bright. But it turns out she has some good acting skills, for those who can't see through her facade. Thankfully, I think most people can see right through her. Nothing there.
Hip Hip Hooray for Peter Navarro and Donald Trump for their honesty, akill and and patriotism!!
Terry Oldberg, Engineer/Scientist/Public Policy Researcher
Los Altos Hills, California
terry_oldberg@yahoo.com ( email )
We need to not pay attention to the monotonic diatribe spewing from the enemies of USA. Of course this platform is preaching to the choir. Where I live, Western PA, we are the choir being preached to. Scary enough, sports broadcasters are pro-kamala.
It was obvious to me Kamala was prepared for the questions and knew how she would respond. Ignoring the question about the economy and making a statement instead was rehearsed.
... and stop calling Shirley