Agreed that neither Tucker nor anyone else at Fox can be trusted. Never forget they were in on the fraud; they called AZ soon after polls closed. None of the hosts believe there was fraud. They hate Trump. Controlled opposition, in the words of Lin Wood. Agree with Dr Navarro here to listen and support all the other great America First shows and podcasts, through podcast apps or Rumble. Or live stream OAN or RAV or RSBN.
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
Boris can your neocon horse💩. Watch the video below, it has subtitles, it’s from 2014 (not sure whether it’s pre or post Maidain (Obama/Soros coup) where an oligarch network journalist hack exposing their plans for the Donbas region. Since the 90s when Bill Clinton spent tens of billions funding the descendants of the bolsheviks to takeover Ukraine they have looted every area of it except the areas with the largest ethnic Russian population, Zelensky started using the Azov who are leftists, socialists to terrorize ethnic Russian people in the Donbas. You don’t get to censor those people by alleging they aren’t who they know themselves to be because you want your fellow parasites to pick the bones of their lands clean, just as you are trying to do to the US. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICkcyt87Lw0
We fully agree -- except that Azov and Banderists are NOT leftists and socialists but pure Nazis !! That was shown for years -- pure Nazis !! How you failed to comprehend that?
Russians in Nazi-dominate Ukraine were scheduled for a genocide.
Intelligent and capable Putin tried for two decades to warn fascist West that NATO expansion into Ukraine and Geogia is unacceptable and Russia's red line. A brief history by Jacob Dreizin, that I shared, nicely summarizes that Ukraine state is a very recent construct.
The original nazis, the national aka German socialist workers party were & their Ukrainian offshoot the Azov, are socialists, leftist. Their base that lifted the nazis to power are also the same as the democrats base labor. I am no fan of Putin, but he was invited in by ethnic Russian Ukrainian citizens who seceded from Ukraine because they feared for their lives. Your propagandist piece by Dreizen is pure neocon contempt for ethnic Ukrainian ethnic Russian Christians.
Telling the truth isn’t manipulating reality, stop accusing others of what you are guilty of, neocon. I stand with my country, the USA, a sovereign nation under assault by corrupt treasonous political leaders colluding with foreign criminals.
Mary, I do not agree or disagree with you or Boris. I am just trying to understand all of this. You talk about destruction and looting …what are you referring to? What knowledge do you have? I’d like to know more. What was the tens of billions for?
I stopped watching Tucker the night Fox News bizarrely called the race. Quite literally anyone still at a network like that has someone in their ear. Don’t trust any of it. I do think he’s doing some interesting things that could ultimately aid the cause of liberty, but I’ve been “out” for a while now.
There’s alot of people in the mainstream media to critique and distrust. However, I haven’t seen anything to warrant this level of distrust of Tucker Carlson.
On the first day of the Jan 6 video footage, Tucker told his audience that no one at Fox interfered with his reporting. I wasn’t the only one who noticed his second show seemed lacking. I think Fox/Murdoch decided that he had done too much damage to the narrative and took away his original programming he had scheduled for later in the week.
So what that Tucker has sent questions about Ukraine to the presidential candidates? You said that’s pompous. Okay, they don’t have to answer. Is this the hill you want to die on Peter? Really?
Tucker is the only person in the mainstream media who is against the war in Ukraine. No one else at Fox or anywhere else in the mainstream media dares question the US narrative. Tucker does. He deserves an enormous amount of credit for that.
Peter, I don’t know what bothers you so much about Tucker. I hope this post isn’t what really bothers you about Tucker because this is a weak list of reasons (He sent questions to Presidential candidates, He cancelled my invitation to his show). You, of all people, ought to know that Tucker’s cancellations probably has more to do with his bosses than an attempt to waste your time. Give the man benefit of the doubt Peter, I think he’s earned that.
I believe there is truth to what Peter is stating, that Tucker has walked the fine line between satisfying Murdoch (his primary goal) and his audience (secondary). He has enormous appeal and Fox allows him to push boundaries only for ratings. If Tucker leaves Fox, then so will the rest of us and they know it.
Saved what? Twitter is still censoring conservatives & the US is almost all the way down that slippery slope. You sound like a neocon, trolling this blog in an attempt to discredit someone speaking inconvenient truths
Why is Twitter still banning War Room and Steve Bannon? Do you think Elon would dare to criticize China on Twitter? No, because he owes his livelihood right now to the CCP.
Sorry, I so disagree about Tucker and his Ukraine rants. While I can appreciate his desire that I share that US troop involvement be minimized, He is much too wrong about aspects of the Ukraine conflict. That suggests he has picked up some of the propaganda created by the Russians to justify their actions. It would take a bit more time to explain that he is wrong about the degree of corruption within Ukraine and the so-called Nazi influences that he clearly misunderstands. Trying to understand the Donbas and a very complex history requires study time that Tucker (or staff) clearly have not tried.
I do believe that Russia needs to be countered to avoid further escalations. I don't care who runs Russia or what Putin does inside Russia, but do care that they don't rebuild the USSR. I do think that the EU needs to do more but Biden won't push the issue because he is a fool and they laugh at him. Trump could embarrass them because he doesn't care what the EU thinks of him. Pity we don't have a Trump-type in charge.
Yeah, sure. The game of pitting Russian criminals against Ukrainian criminals with both getting rich in the years pre-2014 has ended. Many fewer oligarchs now in Ukraine is a good thing for the people. And I suspect as a result of Putin's war choice he has set Russia back 20 years. Those living in Ukraine agreed many years ago regarding their desire to be free of Russia. Maybe this time it will stick.
" protect its Russian population from 8 years of persecution " - direct Russian propaganda, what happened between 1991-2014 in the Donbas? That's when citizens there were doing fine with little strife. As in many place there have always been disagreements between places; thus the E-W divide in Ukraine similar to Blue-Red in the US.
As for the Nazism, they can’t avoid it. A Short History of Ukraine State
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
US & the "west" pinky swore "not one inch east" but NATO wanted to expand to RU border, break up the country or install puppet as leader to plunder RU resources
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
I have been watching Bannon's Warroom since the day it began in 2019. I have learned more from that show than from anywhere else. You have been a huge contributor to that. Have learned and loved every interview Bannon has had with you. Thanks you and the others on that show, my eyes have been OPENED forever. I just found out about this substack from Dr. Malone, who is also one of the educators on that show. Part of the extremely BRAVE truth tellers that need to be supported. Thank you for everything that you do.
Right on spot. Yet if it wasn't for him, so many important topics wouldn't be covered by any mass media. He is still important to wake the sleepy up!
We need our own independent media... but how? gab, truthsocial, Telegram, (add your favorite) have thousands of users but not even close to dominant media reach.
Just think about the recent videos on J6:
The 2020 election was a coup, allowed by all election certifying authorities1, especially Trump’s back-stabbing vice-president Mike Pence 2, who should be in jail for violating the Constitution by certifying the election in spite of the massive evidence of fraud at the time, but is free promoting his self-forgiving book, “So help me God”, a perfect title for an un-repented useful globalist minion:
6 Jan 2021. The fabricated deadly “insurrection”, without guns and victims, was necessary to put pressure on the judges. In spite the FBI tried to delete thousands of messages and destroyed 338 pieces of evidence from the trials, the Mar 2023 leaked video, hidden by the commission since the beginning, completely debunked the narrative,.3 Obama made propaganda more legal with the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012. FBI, CIA, DOJ, Obama, Clinton, Comey, Brennan, McCabe, Strzok, Clapper, Schiff ... all knew Trump was innocent but they smeared him without any consequence.
Jacob Chansley (aka Jake Angeli), the “Qanon Shaman”, was an ex navy discharged for mental illness, an asperger/autistic man who easily followed orders4, an actor5, climate change activist, in a live interview with Nancy Pelosi’s son-in-law, Michiel Vos, just before politely being led in, escorted and even opening the doors for him, by the Capitol Police, under the orders of Nancy Pelosi:, who since the day before, had refused several requests of National Guard back-up asked by the Chief of the Capitol Police. He didn’t go to trial but pleaded guilty. 6
Dr. Ron Paul: “The goal of the Jan 6 Committee is not to seek justice for the 'crime' of trespassing and putting feet on Pelosi’s sacred desk, but to make sure that Donald Trump is never allowed to run for President again. That is the reason hundreds have been unjustly arrested and held in terrible conditions for non-crimes. The purpose of the Committee has been to prop up the false narrative that somehow a few rowdy protesters who broke into the Capitol Building were the equivalent of the storming of the Bastille.”7
Note: police officer Brian Sicknick who was presented as a victim, died “naturally” 2 days later. Photos showed a healthy fit 42 year old man. Capitol police had the first COVID clotshot 6 Dec 2020, and the second probably before 6 Jan. He wasn’t a victim of the mostly peaceful manifestation but of those who ordered the police to let the people in, the same ones ordering compulsory haccination.
In sum, it the insurrection was promoted by Pelosi and minions (very few broke things and opened the way, the rest just followed peacefully incentivised by fake planted leaders.
I’m a big fan of President Trump and will donate in time to his 2024 bid. But Navarro’s petty attacks on Tucker will cost Navarro his own credibility. Tucker is employed by FOX and unless Navarro can offer Tucker a better access to the public and a higher salary, Navarro best step back and STFU.
"We Mutually Pledge To Each Other Our Lives, Our Fortunes, And Our Sacred Honor…"
What true heroes said and did to cast off a tyrannical king. And most of the signers of the Declaration of Independence lost their lives and fortunes. And honor in the most respectable loyalist circles in the colonies, though held high in their posterity; we honor their sacrifices.
Your message wasn't objectionable until your inclusion of a higher salary for Tucker to break from Fox and stand firmly with Patriots reveals a belief that heroic patriots of our time needn't risk their lives, fortunes and sacred honor to secure the blessings of liberty we once enjoyed in this nation. Not only won't he risk what the signers of the Declaration risked, and lost, but you'd say he should get a raise for doing it?!?! I find that highly objectionable. No movement can succeed with mere mercenaries leading them. But controlled opposition is very successful at putting down true opposition movements.
This comment didn't age well - it appears that Tucker in fact has risked his fortune as he stepped on the toes of the Murdochs, the uniparty, and their media pundits....
Of course I appreciate and always appreciate sunlight he and others shine on the many lies and deceits of our world today. And, yes, he takes more risks telling more dangerous truths. Tucker gets a hat tip now, as I have him before.
But I also know controlled opposition plays a very long game. The biggest con's take the longest to pull off, by those who earn the confidence of the mark(s). He is on Twitter. Which still censors others saying what he says, and is now being led by a notable censorship industry executive.
My opinion of him remains skeptical, but appreciative of his remarks. I fully trust no man today, not Tucker, not Trump, no man. I only fully trust God.
Which is the only way we don't get duped or conned by any false prophets or heroes. We take what they say for what it is, how it informs us, but we still must apply our skeptism and discernment God gave us to determine the truthfulness of even our friends and allies. As long as we take what Tucker shares in to help us notice patterns, how to critically think and not just drink in what he thinks as gospel we use his shares for our betterment and understanding a complex world. Holding him the same as we've held others who we once supported until they betrayed us. Wiser for those experiences.
My take is like how I view our Presidents. I don’t care what they did or do before and after they are president. Just what they do while President! Tucker is the only newscaster holding anyone’s feet to the fire!! Peter, whatever beef you have with Tucker and Fox should be shelved until we get a real President elected. Sour grapes don’t help stop the far left slide our country is having. Let’s get a rational government established then we can fine tune it.👍👍🇺🇸🇺🇸Doug Stuart
Thank you. Elon Musk is a miracle that happens once in a century.
He single-handedly unmasked the murderous and deeply corrupt US War party – with Twitter Files (J6 choreographed hoax, Russia-gate immense 5-year hoax, has broken total media censorship of terrorist US attack on NATO member Germany and of Covid conspiracy with Pfizer crime organization, of massive crimes by Nazi-dominated Ukraine government which is a mere puppet of US bipartisan War part, etc.).
Elon Musk immense courage and humanity is fully displayed by his one single three-word tweet:
Intelligent, always completely peaceful, childlike US veteran, Jacob Chansley (with documented 15-year innocent mental issues) has been transformed by bloodthirsty and amoral US War party criminals, primarily Democrat leadership and FBI executives, into a symbol of (unarmed) J6 “insurrection” by grotesque lies and evidence hiding.
Peaceful and playful Jacob was tortured by years-long solitary isolation (Tocqueville defined prolonged solitary confinement as instrument of torture) and sentenced to long prison term – despite being now provably innocent of all charges.
In my opinion Donald Trump was the best President of the past 60 years. However, I will support whichever Republican candidate is best positioned to win the 2024 election. My sense is that Trump can't win because the lamestream media has smeared his name for the past 7 years. On the other hand, I think that Governor DeSantis can win, and perhaps easily with large coattails especially if Trump supports him.
The "goal" for DeSantis eyeing the presidency is to remove him from governing Florida AND use enough fraud to prevent him from becoming president, if the stars aligned to put him into first position. "They" want him not doing things for Florida or the country and will pour (Soros) tons of moolah to facilitate that.
DeSantis will continue to govern Florida when he runs for President. Plus, watch all the great things that the Florida legislature does during the next couple months.
Those who deeply feared Trump and by far these are not just rabid Democrats. In fact these are Neocons, the likes of anti-Trumpers'. Look at Bolton: a Right loved Hannity approved Foreign Policy adviser that had injustice failing to get consent as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations according to Right Wing Pundits , except Limbaugh. Look at what the lunatic has become once he was denied permission and authority to create Iraq style destruction in Venezuela. From Day one the Deep State moved the levers on Russia Gate. They are moving them today, and Desantis is there Go To. Sorry he is all establishment. That he fights the left woke-ness means little and is one State afforded air cover for another Bush in the form of Ronald Dion DeSantis placed in power, if he can even withstand the arsenal that will be laid against him once he stands in the major cross hairs, and if he does get to that place he will be like all the rest-take the Oath of the Deep State and he has no other treasure to fight against the assault the deep state can bring.
Trump. Navarro and a handful of others never took the deep state oath that even Jessie Ventura spoke about when he became Gov.
Not a Tucker fan. However, this piece is seemingly written by one behaving like a small child, angry because they got kicked out of the sand box. "Tucker thinks his ratings are..." "...apparent belief that because the show is so popular and highly rated..." "...Tucker apparently thinks he can do it because his show is so popular." "Second, his on-air populist, nationalist personality aside, Tucker appears to care more about ratings than policy...""he is getting away with it because of the popularity of the show."
All of the above quotes seemingly illustrate your opinion only, riddled with smear. I appreciate we are all entitled to opnion. In fact, isn't that what Tucker says his show is? However, rather than more mud slinging through opnion pieces, which is so common and boring I might add, why not provide salient points with evidence. Just my opinion.
I disagree, Peter is correct, and I cannot fathom your rather childish attempt insults. These are critical issues and we don’t have the luxury of time. Tucker only devotes a minute to guests impacted by, etc these important issues, his attention is transitory when focus and details are crucial
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
Hehe! I watch him and appreciate he exposes much that would never see the light of day. However, I do find at times he can stop short of getting to the most damaging of what he's reporting on(I don't have an example at hand). I just often find myself asking aloud after his scathing reports, "but what about...?"
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
I am checking out your substack because Dr Malone recommended it. The first article that I see listed is this childish petty stupid attack on Tucker Carlson. He is far more trustworthy than you will ever be Mr Navarro. In my eyes with this one article you have pissed away any credibility you gained through Dr Malone’s recommendation. Tucker is the ONLY news pundit employed by a mainline news media company that dares to call attention to the corruption on BOTH sides of the political isle. I suspect that is the reason for your petulant hit piece article. You don’t really care about a candidate questionnaire. You just want to discredit Tucker because he might say something bad about Trump. Trump was a great president. I personally believe he was even better than Reagan. However he also had some horrendous missteps. He exponentially increased the power and influence of Fauci who should be spending the rest of his life in prison. At the same time Trump gave the criminal major pharmaceutical companies the keys to the kingdom through Operation Warp Speed. That abomination gave us the COVID vaccine death jab which has proven to be more deadly and harmful than every other vaccine ever made combined. So Mr Navarro while your loyalty to your old boss is admirable your misguided attempt to slander Tucker Carlson because he isn’t a sold out Trump fan is just plain stupid.
Tucker Carlson has already folded-up and wilted away on the whole Jan 6th Video exposure.
. He failed to show the Video of Michael Byrd (Capital Police) murdering Ashley Babbit in cold blood for no reason.
. He failed to show the Video of the Capital Police opening up the magnetic doors.
. He failed to show the other murders done by the Capital Police & ANTIFA against innocent protesters.
. He failed to highlight the Criminal Planning & Setup of the whole situation by Nancy Pelosi.
All Tucker did was make a defense for the "Viking guy". That's it.
And THAT was NOT The Story here at all.
The Story was that the Capital Police, & ANTIFA under orders by Nancy Pelosi, staged the whole set of events to entrap innocent Jan 6th protesters -- and THEY (not the protesters themselves) were the Violent Mob, and they were the ones who murdered innocent people.
The Video that Tucker Carlson ---still refuses to show on air---- PROVES that point.
But all Tucker cared about was the goofy moron in a Viking outfit with no shirt on.
Silly me here I’ve been thinking that the country is teetering on the brink of self destruction- however if a MAGA leader of your caliber has decided that shredding a conservative like Tucker is the most valuable way to use your time and social media presence, things must not be as dire as they appear.
I love Tucker and watch a lot - BUT - I watch and listen critically, because you are RIGHT, Mr. Navarro: he gets reigned in when it really matters.
Case in point: he - along with every other Fox "celeb" was not allowed to mention the "2,000 Mules" movie, which factually obliterated the phony Biden s/election.
Fox is not to be trusted; they exist, after all, to make money, and to push an agenda - NOT to inform and educate the American people.
I agree RMM - Tucker just skirts around issues and never delves too deeply. Look when he had Tony Bobulinski on connected to Hunter Biden - no valuable follow up, no proper investigation.
Everything is rushed thru in small bites of information.
Peter, I like you, but you are being way too picky. There is nothing wrong with Tucker surveying candidates. Everyone should. We’d find out where they stand. Tucker Carlson attacks our enemies. Our enemies attack Tucker. Tucker exposes the corruption. He’s the biggest voice opposing Ukraine. He even spelled out the deep state’s roles in JFK, Nixon, and trying to take down Trump. Who else has done that? We can’t afford to alienate our friends just because they aren’t “perfect”.
No seriously Peter is correct. I have come to like Tucker but every so often I recognize that he is still the guy I remember from a few decades ago. No one’s saying don’t watch him, just don’t be surprised when what Peter has warned about happens. He has stopped interviewing good populists, and his other guests only get a few minutes, not enough to discuss things in depth.
First of all, I'm happy to see you on Substack! Secondly, I think Tucker Carlson, the man with the highest-rated news show in the USA is probably feeling his oats - being the only man entrusted with the videotapes of the FBI riot. What is he up to? Who does he think he is? He could spearhead a completely new and completely different political movement. He could be the Howard Beale of the 21st century or the T. Boone Pickens of the West. It will be interesting to see his political trajectory. It is clear that he is unique among the FOX News' celebrities and his program does not follow the mold established by CNN and MSNBC. In other words, while it is impossible to tell where Sean Hannity's show ends and Laura Ingraham's begins, Tucker seems to have a mind of his own.
It's a bit early to start talking about the 2024 election, though. It's likely that we will be either starving or continuing to lead the world into fascism and perversion in 20 months.
Agreed that neither Tucker nor anyone else at Fox can be trusted. Never forget they were in on the fraud; they called AZ soon after polls closed. None of the hosts believe there was fraud. They hate Trump. Controlled opposition, in the words of Lin Wood. Agree with Dr Navarro here to listen and support all the other great America First shows and podcasts, through podcast apps or Rumble. Or live stream OAN or RAV or RSBN.
Ed - you are beyond help in your blindness
Please think about below -- about new 51st US state ;-))
Jacob Dreizin – March 16 -- https://thedreizinreport.com/2023/03/15/silicon-valley-bank-and-donetsk/
As for the Nazism, they can’t avoid it.
A Short History of Ukraine State
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
Boris can your neocon horse💩. Watch the video below, it has subtitles, it’s from 2014 (not sure whether it’s pre or post Maidain (Obama/Soros coup) where an oligarch network journalist hack exposing their plans for the Donbas region. Since the 90s when Bill Clinton spent tens of billions funding the descendants of the bolsheviks to takeover Ukraine they have looted every area of it except the areas with the largest ethnic Russian population, Zelensky started using the Azov who are leftists, socialists to terrorize ethnic Russian people in the Donbas. You don’t get to censor those people by alleging they aren’t who they know themselves to be because you want your fellow parasites to pick the bones of their lands clean, just as you are trying to do to the US. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICkcyt87Lw0
We fully agree -- except that Azov and Banderists are NOT leftists and socialists but pure Nazis !! That was shown for years -- pure Nazis !! How you failed to comprehend that?
Russians in Nazi-dominate Ukraine were scheduled for a genocide.
Intelligent and capable Putin tried for two decades to warn fascist West that NATO expansion into Ukraine and Geogia is unacceptable and Russia's red line. A brief history by Jacob Dreizin, that I shared, nicely summarizes that Ukraine state is a very recent construct.
The original nazis, the national aka German socialist workers party were & their Ukrainian offshoot the Azov, are socialists, leftist. Their base that lifted the nazis to power are also the same as the democrats base labor. I am no fan of Putin, but he was invited in by ethnic Russian Ukrainian citizens who seceded from Ukraine because they feared for their lives. Your propagandist piece by Dreizen is pure neocon contempt for ethnic Ukrainian ethnic Russian Christians.
Have it your way with manipulating reality and -- white is black also...
Stand with Russia -- it is on righr side of history in this "unprovoked" conflict
Telling the truth isn’t manipulating reality, stop accusing others of what you are guilty of, neocon. I stand with my country, the USA, a sovereign nation under assault by corrupt treasonous political leaders colluding with foreign criminals.
Mary, I do not agree or disagree with you or Boris. I am just trying to understand all of this. You talk about destruction and looting …what are you referring to? What knowledge do you have? I’d like to know more. What was the tens of billions for?
I stopped watching Tucker the night Fox News bizarrely called the race. Quite literally anyone still at a network like that has someone in their ear. Don’t trust any of it. I do think he’s doing some interesting things that could ultimately aid the cause of liberty, but I’ve been “out” for a while now.
There’s alot of people in the mainstream media to critique and distrust. However, I haven’t seen anything to warrant this level of distrust of Tucker Carlson.
On the first day of the Jan 6 video footage, Tucker told his audience that no one at Fox interfered with his reporting. I wasn’t the only one who noticed his second show seemed lacking. I think Fox/Murdoch decided that he had done too much damage to the narrative and took away his original programming he had scheduled for later in the week.
So what that Tucker has sent questions about Ukraine to the presidential candidates? You said that’s pompous. Okay, they don’t have to answer. Is this the hill you want to die on Peter? Really?
Tucker is the only person in the mainstream media who is against the war in Ukraine. No one else at Fox or anywhere else in the mainstream media dares question the US narrative. Tucker does. He deserves an enormous amount of credit for that.
Peter, I don’t know what bothers you so much about Tucker. I hope this post isn’t what really bothers you about Tucker because this is a weak list of reasons (He sent questions to Presidential candidates, He cancelled my invitation to his show). You, of all people, ought to know that Tucker’s cancellations probably has more to do with his bosses than an attempt to waste your time. Give the man benefit of the doubt Peter, I think he’s earned that.
I believe there is truth to what Peter is stating, that Tucker has walked the fine line between satisfying Murdoch (his primary goal) and his audience (secondary). He has enormous appeal and Fox allows him to push boundaries only for ratings. If Tucker leaves Fox, then so will the rest of us and they know it.
Tucker and Elon are two American heroes -- perhaps they saved what is left of democracy in the US. Navarro is full of something....
Saved what? Twitter is still censoring conservatives & the US is almost all the way down that slippery slope. You sound like a neocon, trolling this blog in an attempt to discredit someone speaking inconvenient truths
Why is Twitter still banning War Room and Steve Bannon? Do you think Elon would dare to criticize China on Twitter? No, because he owes his livelihood right now to the CCP.
Sorry, I so disagree about Tucker and his Ukraine rants. While I can appreciate his desire that I share that US troop involvement be minimized, He is much too wrong about aspects of the Ukraine conflict. That suggests he has picked up some of the propaganda created by the Russians to justify their actions. It would take a bit more time to explain that he is wrong about the degree of corruption within Ukraine and the so-called Nazi influences that he clearly misunderstands. Trying to understand the Donbas and a very complex history requires study time that Tucker (or staff) clearly have not tried.
I do believe that Russia needs to be countered to avoid further escalations. I don't care who runs Russia or what Putin does inside Russia, but do care that they don't rebuild the USSR. I do think that the EU needs to do more but Biden won't push the issue because he is a fool and they laugh at him. Trump could embarrass them because he doesn't care what the EU thinks of him. Pity we don't have a Trump-type in charge.
Your rant shows that you are
-- utterly ignorant on Ukraine and its Nazi-dominated government which is a mere puppet of US bipartisan War party and
-- about “unprovoked” Russia invasion of Ukraine to protect its Russian population from 8 years of persecution and war.
Hence dumb and ignorant or a War party troll
Yeah, sure. The game of pitting Russian criminals against Ukrainian criminals with both getting rich in the years pre-2014 has ended. Many fewer oligarchs now in Ukraine is a good thing for the people. And I suspect as a result of Putin's war choice he has set Russia back 20 years. Those living in Ukraine agreed many years ago regarding their desire to be free of Russia. Maybe this time it will stick.
" protect its Russian population from 8 years of persecution " - direct Russian propaganda, what happened between 1991-2014 in the Donbas? That's when citizens there were doing fine with little strife. As in many place there have always been disagreements between places; thus the E-W divide in Ukraine similar to Blue-Red in the US.
Perhaps this excellent overview might help you understand a bit:
Jacob Dreizin – March 16 -- https://thedreizinreport.com/2023/03/15/silicon-valley-bank-and-donetsk/
As for the Nazism, they can’t avoid it. A Short History of Ukraine State
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
u wrong
Well thought out response. Perhaps you have better info?
Your Welcome ❕
Nazis r REAL
- https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=nazi+ukraine
- https://search.brave.com/search?q=far+right+Ukraine&source=desktop&tf=2013-01-16to2022-01-16
Mink Agreement
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minsk_agreements
Merkel/ NATO aka US/ NATO lied about Minsk agreements
- https://youtu.be/0-57KOwG9co
Zelensky lied about Minsk
- https://www.globalresearch.ca/zelensky-admits-he-never-intended-implement-minsk-agreements/5811609
France Lied of Minsk
- https://newsunrolled.com/world/183226.html
US & the "west" pinky swore "not one inch east" but NATO wanted to expand to RU border, break up the country or install puppet as leader to plunder RU resources
- https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2017-12-12/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early
- https://youtu.be/uqVPM0KSUpo
- https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3063.html (notice Sep 2022 update telling us not to believe our lying eyes)
also Ukraine changed their constitution ~2019 making it mandatory to join NATO & EU
Poor HardeeHo -- perhaps this might help ypu - about new 51st US state ;-))
Jacob Dreizin – March 16 -- https://thedreizinreport.com/2023/03/15/silicon-valley-bank-and-donetsk/
As for the Nazism, they can’t avoid it.
A Short History of Ukraine State
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
Thank you and -- about new 51st US state:
Jacob Dreizin – March 16 -- https://thedreizinreport.com/2023/03/15/silicon-valley-bank-and-donetsk/
As for the Nazism, they can’t avoid it.
A Short History of Ukraine State
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
Thanks, and - about new 51st US state:
Jacob Dreizin – March 16 -- https://thedreizinreport.com/2023/03/15/silicon-valley-bank-and-donetsk/
As for the Nazism, they can’t avoid it.
A Short History of Ukraine State
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
I have been watching Bannon's Warroom since the day it began in 2019. I have learned more from that show than from anywhere else. You have been a huge contributor to that. Have learned and loved every interview Bannon has had with you. Thanks you and the others on that show, my eyes have been OPENED forever. I just found out about this substack from Dr. Malone, who is also one of the educators on that show. Part of the extremely BRAVE truth tellers that need to be supported. Thank you for everything that you do.
Right on spot. Yet if it wasn't for him, so many important topics wouldn't be covered by any mass media. He is still important to wake the sleepy up!
We need our own independent media... but how? gab, truthsocial, Telegram, (add your favorite) have thousands of users but not even close to dominant media reach.
Just think about the recent videos on J6:
The 2020 election was a coup, allowed by all election certifying authorities1, especially Trump’s back-stabbing vice-president Mike Pence 2, who should be in jail for violating the Constitution by certifying the election in spite of the massive evidence of fraud at the time, but is free promoting his self-forgiving book, “So help me God”, a perfect title for an un-repented useful globalist minion:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-2020-american-coup
6 Jan 2021. The fabricated deadly “insurrection”, without guns and victims, was necessary to put pressure on the judges. In spite the FBI tried to delete thousands of messages and destroyed 338 pieces of evidence from the trials, the Mar 2023 leaked video, hidden by the commission since the beginning, completely debunked the narrative,.3 Obama made propaganda more legal with the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012. FBI, CIA, DOJ, Obama, Clinton, Comey, Brennan, McCabe, Strzok, Clapper, Schiff ... all knew Trump was innocent but they smeared him without any consequence.
Jacob Chansley (aka Jake Angeli), the “Qanon Shaman”, was an ex navy discharged for mental illness, an asperger/autistic man who easily followed orders4, an actor5, climate change activist, in a live interview with Nancy Pelosi’s son-in-law, Michiel Vos, just before politely being led in, escorted and even opening the doors for him, by the Capitol Police, under the orders of Nancy Pelosi:, who since the day before, had refused several requests of National Guard back-up asked by the Chief of the Capitol Police. He didn’t go to trial but pleaded guilty. 6
Dr. Ron Paul: “The goal of the Jan 6 Committee is not to seek justice for the 'crime' of trespassing and putting feet on Pelosi’s sacred desk, but to make sure that Donald Trump is never allowed to run for President again. That is the reason hundreds have been unjustly arrested and held in terrible conditions for non-crimes. The purpose of the Committee has been to prop up the false narrative that somehow a few rowdy protesters who broke into the Capitol Building were the equivalent of the storming of the Bastille.”7
Note: police officer Brian Sicknick who was presented as a victim, died “naturally” 2 days later. Photos showed a healthy fit 42 year old man. Capitol police had the first COVID clotshot 6 Dec 2020, and the second probably before 6 Jan. He wasn’t a victim of the mostly peaceful manifestation but of those who ordered the police to let the people in, the same ones ordering compulsory haccination.
In sum, it the insurrection was promoted by Pelosi and minions (very few broke things and opened the way, the rest just followed peacefully incentivised by fake planted leaders.
More here:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
I’m a big fan of President Trump and will donate in time to his 2024 bid. But Navarro’s petty attacks on Tucker will cost Navarro his own credibility. Tucker is employed by FOX and unless Navarro can offer Tucker a better access to the public and a higher salary, Navarro best step back and STFU.
"We Mutually Pledge To Each Other Our Lives, Our Fortunes, And Our Sacred Honor…"
What true heroes said and did to cast off a tyrannical king. And most of the signers of the Declaration of Independence lost their lives and fortunes. And honor in the most respectable loyalist circles in the colonies, though held high in their posterity; we honor their sacrifices.
Your message wasn't objectionable until your inclusion of a higher salary for Tucker to break from Fox and stand firmly with Patriots reveals a belief that heroic patriots of our time needn't risk their lives, fortunes and sacred honor to secure the blessings of liberty we once enjoyed in this nation. Not only won't he risk what the signers of the Declaration risked, and lost, but you'd say he should get a raise for doing it?!?! I find that highly objectionable. No movement can succeed with mere mercenaries leading them. But controlled opposition is very successful at putting down true opposition movements.
This comment didn't age well - it appears that Tucker in fact has risked his fortune as he stepped on the toes of the Murdochs, the uniparty, and their media pundits....
Has your opinion changed??
Of course I appreciate and always appreciate sunlight he and others shine on the many lies and deceits of our world today. And, yes, he takes more risks telling more dangerous truths. Tucker gets a hat tip now, as I have him before.
But I also know controlled opposition plays a very long game. The biggest con's take the longest to pull off, by those who earn the confidence of the mark(s). He is on Twitter. Which still censors others saying what he says, and is now being led by a notable censorship industry executive.
My opinion of him remains skeptical, but appreciative of his remarks. I fully trust no man today, not Tucker, not Trump, no man. I only fully trust God.
Which is the only way we don't get duped or conned by any false prophets or heroes. We take what they say for what it is, how it informs us, but we still must apply our skeptism and discernment God gave us to determine the truthfulness of even our friends and allies. As long as we take what Tucker shares in to help us notice patterns, how to critically think and not just drink in what he thinks as gospel we use his shares for our betterment and understanding a complex world. Holding him the same as we've held others who we once supported until they betrayed us. Wiser for those experiences.
Thank you very much for this response - it's a rare and indeed wise perspective!
My take is like how I view our Presidents. I don’t care what they did or do before and after they are president. Just what they do while President! Tucker is the only newscaster holding anyone’s feet to the fire!! Peter, whatever beef you have with Tucker and Fox should be shelved until we get a real President elected. Sour grapes don’t help stop the far left slide our country is having. Let’s get a rational government established then we can fine tune it.👍👍🇺🇸🇺🇸Doug Stuart
Peter is correct. All cable news is corrupt. Steve Bannon’s War Room is the best thing going. Real patriots that actually love our country like I do.
Bloodshed & Bullshit, Part Two -- Fake History, the most insidious crime of them all.
Mar 13, 2023 -- https://substack.com/inbox/post/108271183
Thank you. Elon Musk is a miracle that happens once in a century.
He single-handedly unmasked the murderous and deeply corrupt US War party – with Twitter Files (J6 choreographed hoax, Russia-gate immense 5-year hoax, has broken total media censorship of terrorist US attack on NATO member Germany and of Covid conspiracy with Pfizer crime organization, of massive crimes by Nazi-dominated Ukraine government which is a mere puppet of US bipartisan War part, etc.).
Elon Musk immense courage and humanity is fully displayed by his one single three-word tweet:
Free Jacob Chansley https://t.co/8BbeXF2Fye
Intelligent, always completely peaceful, childlike US veteran, Jacob Chansley (with documented 15-year innocent mental issues) has been transformed by bloodthirsty and amoral US War party criminals, primarily Democrat leadership and FBI executives, into a symbol of (unarmed) J6 “insurrection” by grotesque lies and evidence hiding.
Peaceful and playful Jacob was tortured by years-long solitary isolation (Tocqueville defined prolonged solitary confinement as instrument of torture) and sentenced to long prison term – despite being now provably innocent of all charges.
https://substack.com/inbox/post/107896276 -- OUTSTANDING
Bloodshed & Bullshit, Part One -- This has to come to an end. Mar. 11, 2023
------------------------------------------------------------
https://rumble.com/v2cotn2-tucker-carlson-the-truth-needs-to-come-out.html
An outstanding interview with Tucker Carlson
In my opinion Donald Trump was the best President of the past 60 years. However, I will support whichever Republican candidate is best positioned to win the 2024 election. My sense is that Trump can't win because the lamestream media has smeared his name for the past 7 years. On the other hand, I think that Governor DeSantis can win, and perhaps easily with large coattails especially if Trump supports him.
The "goal" for DeSantis eyeing the presidency is to remove him from governing Florida AND use enough fraud to prevent him from becoming president, if the stars aligned to put him into first position. "They" want him not doing things for Florida or the country and will pour (Soros) tons of moolah to facilitate that.
DeSantis will continue to govern Florida when he runs for President. Plus, watch all the great things that the Florida legislature does during the next couple months.
Nailed it.
Those who deeply feared Trump and by far these are not just rabid Democrats. In fact these are Neocons, the likes of anti-Trumpers'. Look at Bolton: a Right loved Hannity approved Foreign Policy adviser that had injustice failing to get consent as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations according to Right Wing Pundits , except Limbaugh. Look at what the lunatic has become once he was denied permission and authority to create Iraq style destruction in Venezuela. From Day one the Deep State moved the levers on Russia Gate. They are moving them today, and Desantis is there Go To. Sorry he is all establishment. That he fights the left woke-ness means little and is one State afforded air cover for another Bush in the form of Ronald Dion DeSantis placed in power, if he can even withstand the arsenal that will be laid against him once he stands in the major cross hairs, and if he does get to that place he will be like all the rest-take the Oath of the Deep State and he has no other treasure to fight against the assault the deep state can bring.
Trump. Navarro and a handful of others never took the deep state oath that even Jessie Ventura spoke about when he became Gov.
Not a Tucker fan. However, this piece is seemingly written by one behaving like a small child, angry because they got kicked out of the sand box. "Tucker thinks his ratings are..." "...apparent belief that because the show is so popular and highly rated..." "...Tucker apparently thinks he can do it because his show is so popular." "Second, his on-air populist, nationalist personality aside, Tucker appears to care more about ratings than policy...""he is getting away with it because of the popularity of the show."
All of the above quotes seemingly illustrate your opinion only, riddled with smear. I appreciate we are all entitled to opnion. In fact, isn't that what Tucker says his show is? However, rather than more mud slinging through opnion pieces, which is so common and boring I might add, why not provide salient points with evidence. Just my opinion.
I disagree, Peter is correct, and I cannot fathom your rather childish attempt insults. These are critical issues and we don’t have the luxury of time. Tucker only devotes a minute to guests impacted by, etc these important issues, his attention is transitory when focus and details are crucial
Poor Mary this is a critical issue -- a new 51st US state:
Jacob Dreizin – March 16 -- https://thedreizinreport.com/2023/03/15/silicon-valley-bank-and-donetsk/
As for the Nazism, they can’t avoid it.
A Short History of Ukraine State
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
Idiotic rumination - have you done anything useful in you life?
And -- why exactly you are not Tucker fan? But we agree - Navarro is full of something...
Hehe! I watch him and appreciate he exposes much that would never see the light of day. However, I do find at times he can stop short of getting to the most damaging of what he's reporting on(I don't have an example at hand). I just often find myself asking aloud after his scathing reports, "but what about...?"
OK - think about new 51st US state:
Jacob Dreizin – March 16 -- https://thedreizinreport.com/2023/03/15/silicon-valley-bank-and-donetsk/
As for the Nazism, they can’t avoid it.
A Short History of Ukraine State
The Ukraine is a historically new construction. Until the late 19th century, the Ukraine was merely a region, and 100% of its inhabitants, the Ukrainians, or Rusyns (Ruthenians) as they were called in areas under Austria at that time, considered that their language, or whatever regional dialect they spoke, was Russian (“Russka mova”), and they had zero political awareness or identity separate from Russia (with the exception of the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were Cossacks, not as presently described, “Ukrainian Cossacks”, LOL.)
The concept of a “Ukrainian language” and the associated identity was constructed in areas under Austrian rule (parts of Galicia and Volhynia), with Austrian support and state financing, immediately after the local iteration of the 1848 revolutions, as a way to quell pro-Russian irredentism among landowners and the Russian Orthodox church in the region. From here on, the Galician literary dialect was also set as the “one and only” Ukrainian language, similar to how the dialect of Florence became “standard Italian.”
Due to Russia’s backwardness, the Russian Empire was unable to standardize its linguistic landscape in the same manner as the Germans and French had largely done by prior to World War 1, or World War 2 at the latest. That process requires compulsory schooling and mass literacy, which Russia did not have until Soviet days. Hence, by the time of the Russian Revolution, the Galician Ukrainist movement had been able to gain some marginal but elite following throughout all territories that spoke Ukrainian dialects rather than “Great Russian.”
This was subsequently channeled, with the Russian collapse of 1917-1918, into the formation of the Ukrainian breakaway state. After this was put down by the Bolsheviks (first and foremost, Ukrainian urban Bolsheviks from Kharkov and what’s today called Donetsk), it again came to life under German rule with the Galician-based Banderist movement.
Most Ukrainians did not vote for independence from the USSR in 1991, but the republic was abandoned by Yeltsin, and thus, had independence thrust upon it. There was a general lack of enthusiasm for the state, a lack of understanding as to its purpose, especially as by this time, almost all Ukrainian citizens spoke Russian as their language of work, at least, and among well over half of the population, of the home as well. In short, there was a near-total ideological vacuum.
The only people who had an ideology… were, well, guess who.
Today, excepting the far northwest, with its dominant Greek Catholic church, the Ukraine is still so similar to Russia (culturally there is ZERO difference)…..
…..that the ONLY way any Ukrainian leadership can aim to make its state distinct, to justify its own rule, is to invent a completely fictitious, phony history of some coherent, historical “Ukraine” that never existed (their school history textbooks are a RIOT)…..
…..and to adopt a “supremacist”, Russian-exclusionist approach and ideology. Like, “We’re not Russian goddamn it, we were never Russian, we will cut the Russian out of us, perhaps slowly, perhaps quickly if we can, but we’ll get rid of it, because the Ukraine isn’t big enough for minorities or two nationalities, so, someone needs to get steamrolled.”
In short, fascism.
The Ukrainian state (under German protection) of 1918, and then again with the Banderist movement (again under German protection, or benign neglect at least) during WW2 and then in exile… were explicitly fascistic. The former, even before the term existed.
I wrote last summer or so, that any independent Ukrainian entity will ALWAYS arrive at fascism as its governing ideology. It just took much longer this time (since 1991), in part because of the dominance of Russian cultural and professional media (and the difficulty in re-Ukrainizing in the absence of a sufficient written base and professional need) and the enormous cross-border family bonds left over from Soviet days.
But, it happened.
Obviously, Uncle Sam has taken advantage of this to establish his 51st state on the territory of the former Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
Obviously, the majority of Ukrainian officials, educators, etc., are just there to get paid. Like people everywhere, they go along and are not driving the ideology.
I am checking out your substack because Dr Malone recommended it. The first article that I see listed is this childish petty stupid attack on Tucker Carlson. He is far more trustworthy than you will ever be Mr Navarro. In my eyes with this one article you have pissed away any credibility you gained through Dr Malone’s recommendation. Tucker is the ONLY news pundit employed by a mainline news media company that dares to call attention to the corruption on BOTH sides of the political isle. I suspect that is the reason for your petulant hit piece article. You don’t really care about a candidate questionnaire. You just want to discredit Tucker because he might say something bad about Trump. Trump was a great president. I personally believe he was even better than Reagan. However he also had some horrendous missteps. He exponentially increased the power and influence of Fauci who should be spending the rest of his life in prison. At the same time Trump gave the criminal major pharmaceutical companies the keys to the kingdom through Operation Warp Speed. That abomination gave us the COVID vaccine death jab which has proven to be more deadly and harmful than every other vaccine ever made combined. So Mr Navarro while your loyalty to your old boss is admirable your misguided attempt to slander Tucker Carlson because he isn’t a sold out Trump fan is just plain stupid.
Tucker Carlson has already folded-up and wilted away on the whole Jan 6th Video exposure.
. He failed to show the Video of Michael Byrd (Capital Police) murdering Ashley Babbit in cold blood for no reason.
. He failed to show the Video of the Capital Police opening up the magnetic doors.
. He failed to show the other murders done by the Capital Police & ANTIFA against innocent protesters.
. He failed to highlight the Criminal Planning & Setup of the whole situation by Nancy Pelosi.
All Tucker did was make a defense for the "Viking guy". That's it.
And THAT was NOT The Story here at all.
The Story was that the Capital Police, & ANTIFA under orders by Nancy Pelosi, staged the whole set of events to entrap innocent Jan 6th protesters -- and THEY (not the protesters themselves) were the Violent Mob, and they were the ones who murdered innocent people.
The Video that Tucker Carlson ---still refuses to show on air---- PROVES that point.
But all Tucker cared about was the goofy moron in a Viking outfit with no shirt on.
I think you are mistaken captain America.
Silly me here I’ve been thinking that the country is teetering on the brink of self destruction- however if a MAGA leader of your caliber has decided that shredding a conservative like Tucker is the most valuable way to use your time and social media presence, things must not be as dire as they appear.
I love Tucker and watch a lot - BUT - I watch and listen critically, because you are RIGHT, Mr. Navarro: he gets reigned in when it really matters.
Case in point: he - along with every other Fox "celeb" was not allowed to mention the "2,000 Mules" movie, which factually obliterated the phony Biden s/election.
Fox is not to be trusted; they exist, after all, to make money, and to push an agenda - NOT to inform and educate the American people.
I agree RMM - Tucker just skirts around issues and never delves too deeply. Look when he had Tony Bobulinski on connected to Hunter Biden - no valuable follow up, no proper investigation.
Everything is rushed thru in small bites of information.
You are silly... Tucker and Elon are two American heroes -- perhaps they saved what is left of democracy in the US.
Peter, I like you, but you are being way too picky. There is nothing wrong with Tucker surveying candidates. Everyone should. We’d find out where they stand. Tucker Carlson attacks our enemies. Our enemies attack Tucker. Tucker exposes the corruption. He’s the biggest voice opposing Ukraine. He even spelled out the deep state’s roles in JFK, Nixon, and trying to take down Trump. Who else has done that? We can’t afford to alienate our friends just because they aren’t “perfect”.
No seriously Peter is correct. I have come to like Tucker but every so often I recognize that he is still the guy I remember from a few decades ago. No one’s saying don’t watch him, just don’t be surprised when what Peter has warned about happens. He has stopped interviewing good populists, and his other guests only get a few minutes, not enough to discuss things in depth.
Your comment is utterly silly...
Tucker and Elon are two American heroes -- perhaps they saved what is left of democracy in the US.
First of all, I'm happy to see you on Substack! Secondly, I think Tucker Carlson, the man with the highest-rated news show in the USA is probably feeling his oats - being the only man entrusted with the videotapes of the FBI riot. What is he up to? Who does he think he is? He could spearhead a completely new and completely different political movement. He could be the Howard Beale of the 21st century or the T. Boone Pickens of the West. It will be interesting to see his political trajectory. It is clear that he is unique among the FOX News' celebrities and his program does not follow the mold established by CNN and MSNBC. In other words, while it is impossible to tell where Sean Hannity's show ends and Laura Ingraham's begins, Tucker seems to have a mind of his own.
It's a bit early to start talking about the 2024 election, though. It's likely that we will be either starving or continuing to lead the world into fascism and perversion in 20 months.
Bloodshed & Bullshit, Part Two -- Fake History, the most insidious crime of them all.
Mar 13, 2023 -- https://substack.com/inbox/post/108271183
It is Speaker McCarthy who allowed his team to view the footage in the Capitol, and will with other networks. The footage belongs to the Capitol.